Disasters

malak wrote:

the fact that that search returned almost exclusively figure skaters for me makes me wonder what on Earth Feral has been eating.

I may need to change my entire view of that gay dog.

*cough* Turn SafeSearch off *cough*

malak wrote:

I may need to change my entire view of that gay dog.

He's a relentless sexual predator. Keep your guard up and never turn your back on him.

DuckDuckGo.

ThePhilosopher wrote:

malak wrote:

I may need to change my entire view of that gay dog.

He's a relentless sexual predator. Keep your guard up and never turn your back on him.

Awww... Why so hard on me? I am cute and fluffy. My jokes are funny. I have no need of violence in my sexual life. My chloroform charms are enough to win over even mostly straight boys at times...

@Jad: DuckDuckGo for the win...

Feral wrote:

*cough* Turn SafeSearch off *cough*

normal view:

normal view:

toggle safe search (to on):

safe search on:

My google algorithm appears tainted by the wyrm.

Feral wrote:

Awww... Why so hard on me? I am cute and fluffy. My jokes are funny. I have no need of violence in my sexual life. My chloroform charms are enough to win over even mostly straight boys at times...

You are complaining about men being hard on you now . . .?

malak wrote:

You are complaining about men being hard on you now . . .?

OH GOD THE INNUENDOS. You're doing it on purpose, aren't ya? Cheeky cunt.

ThePhilosopher wrote:

malak wrote:

You are complaining about men being hard on you now . . .?

OH GOD THE INNUENDOS. You're doing it on purpose, aren't ya? Cheeky cunt.

I started snorting aloud, and it is almost midnight... Bad, man...

malak wrote:

My google algorithm appears tainted by the wyrm.

Or you never look up porn, so google algorithm assumes you would not want to see it. You must be really virtuous, or asexual, person. Or more overworked than me... Try "gay czech skater boys* then. Google will remember for the future, too...

Sad truth...

It's part of living in a big city, Feral!!! Nothing can be done about it!!!!

Well said! You could be a mayor one day!

Jad.3 wrote:

Well said! You could be a mayor one day!

Or they could blow up a governmental buildings and we could have Sharia... What a beautiful thought: no more loudmouth feminists

Feral wrote:

Jad.3 wrote:

Well said! You could be a mayor one day!

Or they could blow up a governmental buildings and we could have Sharia... What a beautiful thought: no more loudmouth feminists

Don't get too excited, you'd share a cell

Jad.3 wrote:

Feral wrote:

Jad.3 wrote:

Well said! You could be a mayor one day!

Or they could blow up a governmental buildings and we could have Sharia... What a beautiful thought: no more loudmouth feminists

Don't get too excited, you'd share a cell

With a Kenian...?
.
.
.
.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/07/europe/theresa-may-terrorism-human-rights/index.html

http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/04/technology/social-media-terrorism-extremism-london/index.html

Unsurprisingly the attack is already being used to justify more government control. I suppose making it easier to deport foreign terrorist suspects is reasonable, but the rest is bullshit. Especially controlling the internet.

And I had such high hopes for Britain. The queen is dead.

Doesn't the UK got one of the most orwellian surveillance systems in the world? But they never stop wanting more, do they?


Notice in the CNN (#fakenews) article how a critic of May says that her laws would give the muslims "their greatest victory". Yeah you cunt, cuz that's what the terrorists are trying to do, they don't really wanna kill you, they just want you to change your laws to better fight them.

The State gets more control while the people are still not protected... Yeah...
Let's face it, these laws will be used far more on politically incorrect right wingers, than on islamists. A conservative could sue you, our middle Eastern brothers could kill you and your entire family. As a police officer, which one would you investigate?

That Sowell guy is totally right. Look at Israel: they don't take anyone's crap. Europe? Bunch of crybabies...

"Khurum Shazad Butt, 27, once worked for the city’s transportation system and was featured in a controversial documentary about jihadis in the U.K. Youssef Zaghba, 22, was reportedly stopped last year trying to travel to Syria."

"He [Khurum Shazad] appears in the film alongside Mohammed Shamsuddin, one of the ringleaders of the group. Shamsuddin proudly proclaimed in the film that the jihadi flag may one day fly over 10 Downing Street, the British prime minister’s residence. He is believed to have fled to Syria in 2014 and appears to have appeared in one of ISIS’ execution videos."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/london-terror-attack-suspects_us_59337ebfe4b0c242ca24ba43

That's insane. I'm pretty sure police should find some sort of justification to lock those people up under the current legislature.

Dragatus wrote:

"Khurum Shazad Butt, 27, once worked for the city’s transportation system and was featured in a controversial documentary about jihadis in the U.K. Youssef Zaghba, 22, was reportedly stopped last year trying to travel to Syria."

"He [Khurum Shazad] appears in the film alongside Mohammed Shamsuddin, one of the ringleaders of the group. Shamsuddin proudly proclaimed in the film that the jihadi flag may one day fly over 10 Downing Street, the British prime minister’s residence. He is believed to have fled to Syria in 2014 and appears to have appeared in one of ISIS’ execution videos."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/london-terror-attack-suspects_us_59337ebfe4b0c242ca24ba43

That's insane. I'm pretty sure police should find some sort of justification to lock those people up under the current legislature.

Yep, insane.

But you could not lock them up. That would offend the Muslim minority.

They don't want to lock up minorities. They want to lock up the majority.

Jad.3 wrote:

They don't want to lock up minorities. They want to lock up the majority.

Only because the majority is defenceless racist...

Feral wrote:

Yep, insane.

But you could not lock them up. That would offend the Muslim minority.

If you meant that only a minority of British Muslims would be offended then I agree.

http://www.barstoolsports.com/barstoolu/london-man-yelled-fuck-you-im-millwall-then-took-on-3-knife-wielding-terrorists-with-nothing-but-his-fists/

That guy deserves a medal.

As for British Muslims... When I lived in London there was a pool ordered by the government. It showed that 70% of young british Muslims agreed with Al-Qaeda's ideas. No other such polls were ordered by the government after that. If my neighborhood, Neasden, was at all representative at that time, the value might have been underestimated.

What year was that?

Just saw this: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jun/05/imams-refuse-funeral-prayers-to-indefensible-london-bridge-attackers